Comparison of Intestinal Bacteria Structure of Metaphire vulgaris from Different Habitats
-
摘要:
目的 蚯蚓肠道微生物种类繁多,其中细菌群落对蚯蚓适应不同的生境具有重要作用,而关于蚯蚓肠道菌群的研究多集中于养殖型蚯蚓,野生蚯蚓的研究相对缺乏。 方法 为解析不同生境野生蚯蚓肠道的菌群差异,本研究采集河北省沧州市农林科学院试验田中的黄瓜地和辣椒地的通俗腔蚓(Metaphire vulgaris),并通过高通量测序对其肠道细菌群落进行了分析。提取蚯蚓肠道微生物总DNA,特异性扩增16S rRNA基因的V3-V4区,利用Illumina Hiseq 2500测序平台进行双端测序,然后对OTU(operational taxonomic unit)归类,并进行物种组成分析、Alpha和Beta多样性分析、样品组间统计分析。 结果 蚯蚓肠道分离土样中CZM(采自辣椒地的蚯蚓)和CZH(采自黄瓜地的蚯蚓)相对丰度大于1%的优势菌属分别为12和13个,肠道细菌中门水平相对丰度最高的是变形菌(Proteobacteria)。同时,还发现一些未分类的细菌,CZH肠道菌群中未分类的细菌较多,且CZH肠道细菌多样性指数也高于CZM。此外,CZH和CZM肠道细菌中丰富度位于前30且有属类分析的OTU代表性序列在系统发育树中位置不同。 结论 在种植不同蔬菜的土壤环境中生存的同种蚯蚓肠道微生物存在差异,取自黄瓜地的蚯蚓肠道细菌多样性指数均显著高于取自辣椒地的样品,表明黄瓜地土壤更有利于蚯蚓形成丰富且稳定的肠道微生物菌群。 -
关键词:
- 通俗腔蚓 /
- 肠道菌群结构 /
- 16S rRNA基因 /
- 农田
Abstract:Objective Various intestinal microorganisms have been found in earthworms, among which the bacterial community plays an important role for earthworms to adapt to different habitats. However, the research on the intestinal flora of earthworms mostly focuses on cultured earthworms. This research will be on wild earthworms. Method Metaphire vulgaris in cucumber and pepper field at Cangzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Hebei Province were collected in order to analyze the differences of the intestinal flora of wild earthworms in different habitats, and their intestinal bacterial communities were analyzed by high-throughput sequencing. The total DNA of earthworm intestinal microorganisms was extracted, the V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA Gene was specifically amplified, and the two terminal sequencings was carried out by Illumina hiseq2500 sequencing platform. Then OTU (operational taxonomic unit) was classified. The species composition analysis, Alpha and Beta diversity analysis, and inter-sample group statistical analysis were carried out. Result The results showed that the dominant bacteria with relative abundance greater than 1% of CZM (earthworm from pepper field) and CZH (earthworm from cucumber field) were 12 and 13. Proteobacteria is the bacterium Phylum with the highest relative abundance of gut microbes. At the same time, some unclassified bacteria were also found, and there were more unclassified bacteria in CZH than CZM. In addition, the abundance of CZH and CZM intestinal bacteria with richness in the top 30 had different positions on the phylogenetic tree. Conclusion This study showed that there were differences in intestinal microorganisms of the same earthworm species living in different vegetable environments, which will provide a reference for understanding the intestinal bacterial community composition of wild-type earthworm species. -
Key words:
- Metaphire vulgaris /
- Intestinal bacteria structure /
- 16S rRNA gene /
- Farmland
-
表 1 ANOVA组间差异分析统计表
Table 1. Statistic of ANOVA difference analysis between groups
Group SS df MS Fs p-value CZM--CZH 0.188621(0.879199) 1(9) 0.188621(0.0863223) 2.18508 0.048* -
[1] 李典友, 程仁法. 指示生物蚯蚓对生态环境质量的指示作用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006, (18): 4637 − 4638. [2] 沈 辉, 万夕和, 何培民, 等. 脊尾白虾肠道微生物菌群结构[J]. 微生物学通报, 2015: 89 − 95. [3] 郜红建, 蒋 新, 魏俊岭, 等. 蚯蚓对污染物的生物富集与环境知识作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006: 370 − 373. [4] 李 彤, 李 翔, 李绍康, 等. 蚯蚓对植物修复石油烃污染土壤的影响[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, (4): 671 − 676. [5] 姚 巍. 蚯蚓对土壤污染的修复作用[J]. 陕西林业科技, 2018, (5): 105 − 108. [6] 乔力盘·阿不力米提, 亚库甫, 阿地里. 蚯蚓粪对改良土壤的作用[J]. 现代农业, 2018, (1): 10 − 11. [7] 刘晋波, 呼世斌, 李晓娜, 等. 蚯蚓粪对油葵修复菲污染土壤的强化作用[J]. 环境工程, 2017, (6): 175 − 179. [8] 代金君, 张 池, 周 波, 等. 蚯蚓肠道对重金属污染土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2015, (5): 95 − 102. [9] 王洪涛, 丁 晶, 邵元虎, 等. 4种蚯蚓肠道微生物对砷毒性的响应差异研究[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(1): 379 − 389. [10] 曹 佳, 王 冲, 皇 彦, 等. 蚯蚓对土壤微生物及生物肥力的影响研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, (5): 1579 − 1586. [11] Wang H T, Ma L, Zhu D, et al. Responses of earthworm Metaphire vulgaris gut microbiota to arsenic and nanoplastics contamination[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022: 806. [12] Wang X, Zhang Y, Zhang Y F, et al. Amynthas corticis genome reveals molecular mechanisms behind global distribution[J]. Communications Biology, 2021, 4(1): 1 − 13. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01566-0 [13] 魏 舸, 王四宝. 按蚊肠道微生物及其在阻断疟疾传播上的应用[J]. 生物资源, 2017, 39(4): 240 − 246. [14] 施曼玲, 邱清波, 计 翔. 两种有鳞类爬行动物消化道微生物的研究[J]. 动物学杂志, 2000, 6: 12 − 15. [15] 徐 芹, 肖能文. 中国陆栖蚯蚓[M]. 中国农业出版社, 2011, 260. [16] 赵 凯, 常志威, 张小燕, 等. 白蚁肠道共生微生物多样性及其防治方法研究现状[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2012, (2): 331 − 337. [17] 相 辉, 李木旺, 赵 勇, 等. 家蚕幼虫中肠细菌群落多样性的PCR-DGGE和16S rDNA文库序列分析[J]. 昆虫学报, 2007, (3): 222 − 233. [18] 朱国繁, 应蓉蓉, 邓绍坡, 等. 土著菌群与蚯蚓肠道菌群共享核心物种协同抵御灭蚁灵胁迫研究[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(6): 1250 − 1260. [19] Martin F, Torelli S, Le Paslier D, et al. Betaproteobacteria dominance and diversity shifts in the bacterial community of a PAH-contaminated soil exposed to phenanthrene[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2012, 162: 345 − 53. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.11.032 [20] Tian G L, Bi Y M, Jiao X L, et al. Application of vermicompost and biochar suppress Fusarium root rot of replanted American ginseng[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2021, 105(18): 6977 − 6991. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11464-y [21] Teng Y, Chen W. Soil Microbiomes—a Promising Strategy for Contaminated Soil Remediation: A Review[J]. Pedosphere, 2019, 29(3): 283 − 97. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(18)60061-X [22] 刘殿锋. 含钾岩石生物转化中的微生物多样性与作用机制研究[D]. 南京师范大学, 2011. [23] Gomez-Brandon M, Lazcano C, Lores M, et al. Short-term stabilization of grape marc through earthworms[J]. Journal of Hazard Materials, 2011, 187: 291 − 295. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.011 [24] Liu D F, Lian B, Wu C H, et al. A comparative study of gut microbiota profiles of earthworms fed in three different substrates[J]. Symbiosis, 2018, 74(1): 21 − 9. doi: 10.1007/s13199-017-0491-6 [25] Hoeffner K, Santonja M, Cluzeau D, et al. Epi-anecic rather than strict-anecic earthworms enhance soil enzymatic activities[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2019, 132: 93 − 100. [26] 吴林坤, 林向民, 林文雄. 根系分泌物介导下植物-土壤-微生物互作关系研究进展与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(3): 298 − 310. [27] Briones M J I, Elias D M O, Grant H K, et al. Plant identity control on soil food web structure and C transfers under perennial bioenergy plantations[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2019: 138.