Ecosystem Quality Evaluation of Gannan Navel Orange Orchard Based on CVOR Index and 3S Technology
-
摘要:
目的 本研究旨在构建针对脐橙园的园地CVOR指数模型,对赣南脐橙园系统进行质量评估。 方法 在生态系统健康评价CVOR理论框架下,以赣南典型脐橙产区寻乌县境内的脐橙园为研究对象,从人工生态系统的组分出发,结合自然要素和人为活动等多源数据,借助GIS软件和遥感平台,研究寻乌脐橙园的质量格局及驱动力。 结果 寻乌脐橙园的基况分指数(C)和VOR分指数(VOR)在空间分布上存在较明显的区别。相关性检验结果显示,两个分指数间的相关系数为0.13。CVOR指数与两个分指数的相关系数分别为0.60和0.84,表明CVOR指数可以作为表征脐橙园的系统状况和基况水平的综合指数。寻乌全县脐橙园的CVOR指数介于0 ~ 0.85之间。高质量的脐橙园主要连片分布于吉谭镇西部、文峰乡东部、澄江镇中部和南桥镇中部,最优质的地块在吉谭镇的圳下村、古丰村和兰贝村。低质量脐橙园在各乡镇呈散乱分布,质量最差的地块处于丹溪乡的双村村。交通条件、地块集聚程度和产量是决定寻乌县脐橙园质量及空间分布的主控因子。 结论 寻乌县脐橙园的系统质量总体良好,但部分脐橙园仍有质量提升的空间。所构建的CVOR指数模型可用于表征脐橙园的系统质量,可为其他园地系统的质量评估提供思路。 Abstract:Objective The paper aims to build a CVOR index model for quality evaluation of navel orange orchards of the Gannan navel orange orchard system. Method A typical navel orange producing area was selected in Xunwu county of southern Jiangxi Province. With measured data (soil organic matter, available nutrients, yield, etc.) and remote sensing data (temperature, altitude, traffic, etc.), a CVOR index model for navel orange orchards was constructed depending on the structure and composition of the artificial ecosystem. Meanwhile, the CVOR index characteristics of navel orange orchards were further studied by ArcGIS software and remote sensing platforms. Result An obvious different spatial pattern of condition (C) and VOR (VOR) sub-indices was posed in Xunwu navel orange orchard. The correlation coefficient between the two sub-indices was 0.13 based on correlation test results. The correlation coefficients between the CVOR index and two sub-indices were 0.60 and 0.84, indicating that the CVOR index could be a comprehensive index to identify the system status and condition level of navel orange orchards. According to the research, the CVOR index of navel orange orchards in Xunwu ranged from 0 to 0.85. High-level navel orange orchards were mainly located in the western Jitan, eastern Wenfeng, the middle of both Chengjiang and Nanqiao. The plots with the highest quality were distributed in the Zhenxia, Gufeng, and Lanbei of Jitan Town. At the same time, low-level orchards were scattered in the townships. The plots with the lowest quality were in Shuangcun village of Danxi Township. Traffic conditions, the degree of land agglomeration and the yield were the main factors that determine the quality and spatial distribution of navel orange orchards in Xunwu County. Conclusion The system quality of navel orange orchards in Xunwu County was well overall, but the system quality of some orchards could be improved. The CVOR index we constructed could reflect the system quality of navel orange orchards and provide ideas for the quality evaluation of other orchard systems. -
Key words:
- Orange orchard /
- CVOR index /
- 3S technology /
- Artificial ecosystem /
- Evalution for ecosystem quality
-
表 1 CVOR指数的指标量化
Table 1. Indicator quantization of CVOR index
分指数
Sub-index准则层
Criterion指标层
Indicator量化过程
Quantitative approach权重
Weight1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 C 气候 气温/℃) 20 ~ 25 15 ~ 20 25 ~ 30 30 ~ 35 < 15 > 35 0.15 降水/(mm) 1200 ~ 1 600 1600 ~ 2000 800 ~ 1200 > 2000 400 ~ 800 < 400 0.10 地形 海拔/m) 200 ~ 400 400 ~ 800 < 200 800 ~ 1000 1000 ~ 1200 > 1200 0.14 坡度(°) 15 ~ 25 5 ~ 15 0 ~ 5 25 ~ 35 35 ~ 45 > 45 0.01 坡向(°) 南 东南; 西南 东; 西 平地 东北; 西北 北 0.02 土壤 土层厚度(cm) > 60 60 ~ 50 50 ~ 40 40 ~ 20 10 ~ 20 < 10 0.08 质地 砂质壤土 砂质黏壤土 黏壤土 壤质黏土 粉砂质黏土 0.13 pH 5.5 ~ 6.5 5.0 ~ 5.5 4.5 ~ 5.0 4.0 ~ 4.5 < 4.0 0.05 6.5 ~ 7.0 7.0 ~ 7.5 7.5 ~ 8.0 > 8.0 有机质(mg kg-1) > 40 40 ~ 30 30 ~ 20 10 ~ 20 5 ~ 10 < 5 0.16 碱解氮(mg kg-1) 100 ~ 200 200 ~ 300 50 ~ 100 > 300 < 50 0.05 有效磷(mg kg-1) 15 ~ 80 80 ~ 200 5 ~ 15 > 200 < 5 0.08 速效钾(mg kg-1) 100 ~ 200 200 ~ 360 50 ~ 100 > 360 < 50 0.03 VOR 活力 归一化植被指数 1 − |NDVI − 0.48| 1/3 组织力 地块密度 PD + |PA-20|−1 + (2-FR) 1/3 地块面积 分形维数 恢复力 居民点密度 SD + TD + HD + FE 1/3 交通密度 水文密度 施肥(N) 表 2 脐橙园质量的CVOR指数及质量等级
Table 2. CVOR index and quality level of navel orange orchards
质量等级
Quality level差
Poor一般
Usual良好
Well较优
Good优
ExcellentCVOR指数 < 0.2 0.2 ~ 0.4 0.4 ~ 0.6 0.6 ~ 0.8 > 0.8 表 3 CVOR指数间的pearson相关性 (n =22407)
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between CVOR indices (n =22407)
基况
C活力
V组织力
O恢复力
RVOR指数
VORCVOR指数
CVOR基况 1.00 活力 0.33** 1.00 组织力 0.01* 0.56** 1.00 恢复力 0.27** 0.66** 0.47** 1.00 VOR指数 0.13** 0.70** 0.92** 0.78** 1.00 CVOR指数 0.60** 0.71** 0.70** 0.77** 0.84** 1.00 注:**代表P< 0.01水平差异显著,*代表P< 0.05水平差异显著 -
[1] 陈亚艳. 基于省际比较视角的赣南脐橙出口竞争力评价[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2015, 43(11): 194 − 197. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2015.11.048 [2] 吴雪燕. 赣南脐橙产业集群形成和发展阶段地方政府作用研究[D]. 南昌: 江西师范大学, 2014. [3] Bagheri B M, Faskhodi A A, Salehi M H, et al. Soil suitability analysis and evaluation of pistachio orchard farming, using canonical multivariate analysis[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 246: 528 − 534. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.069 [4] Gu C M, Liu Y, Mohamed I, et al. Dynamic Changes of Soil Surface Organic Carbon under Different Mulching Practices in Citrus Orchards on Sloping Land[J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11(12): e168384. [5] He Y Z, Li Z R, Tan Fengquan, et al. Fatty acid metabolic flux and lipid peroxidation homeostasis maintain the biomembrane stability to improve citrus fruit storage performance[J]. Food Chemistry, 2019, 292: 314 − 324. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.009 [6] Guo Q Y, Liu K, Deng W H, et al. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Gannan navel orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck cv. Newhall) peel essential oils[J]. Food Science & Nutrition, 2018, 6(6): 1431 − 1437. [7] 刘燕德, 熊松盛, 吴至境, 等. 赣南脐橙园土壤全磷和全钾近红外光谱检测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(18): 156 − 162. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.18.019 [8] 黄素婵, 谢金长, 严 翔, 等. 聚-γ-谷氨酸改善赣南纽荷尔脐橙品质的研究[J]. 中国果菜, 2017, 37(5): 22 − 27. [9] Peng Z Z, Guan L X, Liao Y B, et al. Estimating total leaf chlorophyll content of Gannan Navel Orange leaves using hyperspectral data based on partial least squares regression[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 155540 − 155551. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949866 [10] Sun X D, Zhou H M, Zhou W C, et al. Nondestructive assessment of internal quality of Gannan navel orange by photodiode array spectrometer, 2008[C]. 2008. [11] Yao M Y, Huang L, Zheng J H, et al. Assessment of feasibility in determining of Cr in Gannan Navel Orange treated in controlled conditions by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2013, 52: 70 − 74. [12] 林小兵, 孙永明, 江新凤, 等. 江西省茶园土壤肥力特征及其影响因子[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020: 1 − 14. [13] 刘桂东, 姜存仓, 王运华, 等. 赣南脐橙园土壤基本养分含量分析与评价[J]. 中国南方果树, 2010, 39(1): 1 − 3. [14] 乐丽红, 赵小敏, 霍建明, 等. 基于GIS和NFM的园地多宜性评价研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2009, 31(5): 933 − 938. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2009.05.031 [15] 张 渊. 基于VOR模型的滇池流域生态系统健康多尺度评价研究[D]. 昆明: 云南财经大学, 2020. [16] 周 泉, 叶 茂, 赵凡凡. 基于VOR模型的阿尔泰山林区森林生态系统健康评价[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2021, 56(3): 137 − 148. [17] Xiao R, Liu Y, Fei X, et al. Ecosystem health assessment: A comprehensive and detailed analysis of the case study in coastal metropolitan region, eastern China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 98: 363 − 376. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.010 [18] 侯扶江, 于应文, 傅 华, 等. 阿拉善草地健康评价的CVOR指数[J]. 草业学报, 2004, (4): 117 − 126. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2004.04.021 [19] 单贵莲, 陈 功, 刘钟龄, 等. 典型草原健康评价的VOR和CVOR指数[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(3): 401 − 406. [20] 潘竟虎, 王 云. 基于CVOR和电路理论的讨赖河流域生态安全评价及生态格局优化[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(7): 2582 − 2595. [21] 刘珊珊, 牛超杰, 边 琳, 等. 基于NDVI的水稻产量遥感估测[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(3): 193 − 198. [22] Huang J, Wang X, Li X, et al. Remotely sensed rice yield prediction using multi-temporal NDVI data derived from NOAA's-AVHRR[J]. PLOS One, 2013, 8(8): e70816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070816 [23] Jamshidi S, Zand-Parsa S, Kamgar-Haghighi A A, et al. Evapotranspiration, crop coefficients, and physiological responses of citrus trees in semi-arid climatic conditions[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 227: 105838. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105838 [24] 张效星, 樊 毅, 贾 悦, 等. 水分亏缺对滴灌柑橘光合和产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(3): 143 − 150. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.03.019 [25] Chen J, Yu Z R, Ouyang J L, Mensvoort M. E. F. V. Factors affecting soil quality changes in the North China Plain: A case study of Quzhou County[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2006, 91(3). [26] 朱 颖. 基于语义技术的柑橘园土壤环境判定决策支持系统[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2014.