邓志位, 全 斌, 祁剑青, 彭 科, 樊雪姣. “三生”用地格局演变的强度分析及其驱动力−以衡阳市为例[J]. 土壤通报, 2023, 54(4): 768 − 780. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2022061405
引用本文: 邓志位, 全 斌, 祁剑青, 彭 科, 樊雪姣. “三生”用地格局演变的强度分析及其驱动力−以衡阳市为例[J]. 土壤通报, 2023, 54(4): 768 − 780. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2022061405
DENG Zhi-wei, QUAN Bin, QI Jian-qing, PENG Ke, FAN Xue-jiao. Intensity Analysis and Driving Forces of Pattern Evolution in Productive-Living-Ecological Land: A Case Study of Hengyang City[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2023, 54(4): 768 − 780. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2022061405
Citation: DENG Zhi-wei, QUAN Bin, QI Jian-qing, PENG Ke, FAN Xue-jiao. Intensity Analysis and Driving Forces of Pattern Evolution in Productive-Living-Ecological Land: A Case Study of Hengyang City[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2023, 54(4): 768 − 780. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2022061405

“三生”用地格局演变的强度分析及其驱动力以衡阳市为例

Intensity Analysis and Driving Forces of Pattern Evolution in Productive-Living-Ecological Land: A Case Study of Hengyang City

  • 摘要:
      目的  分析衡阳市生态-生产-生活(“三生”)用地演变特征及其驱动因素,为该区域土地利用配置优化与可持续发展提供依据。
      方法  通过结合变化成分和强度分析方法识别1995 ~ 2020年间衡阳市“三生”用地变化强度特征,并采用斑块生成土地利用模拟(PLUS)模型揭示该区“三生”用地变化驱动机制。
      结果  生态用地和生产生态用地为研究区主要用地类型,其呈缩减趋势;“三生”用地变化成分呈现出数量为主转变成交换为主,且各类别变化成分差异明显;1995 ~ 2015年“三生”用地变化强度低于2015 ~ 2020年,后期呈现更快速的变化;生活生产用地和生态生产用地变化活跃;1995 ~ 2020年生活生产用地增加的主要来源于生态用地和生产生态用地,其转换强度表明生产生态用地稳定趋向转换为生活生产用地,相反,生态用地稳定避免转换为生活生产用地。
      结论  衡阳市生活生产用地扩张强度持续上升,主要受交通基础设施建设因素驱动,致使大量生产、生态功能用地被侵占,该区未来应通过规划统筹与政策导向优化“三生”用地结构。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  The analysis of the Productive-Living-Ecological (PLE) land evolution characteristics and its driving factors in Hengyang City could provide a reference basis for the optimization of land use allocation and sustainable land development in the city.
      Method  The intensity characteristics of PLE land changes in Hengyang City from 1995 to 2020 were identified through a combination of change components and Intensity Analysis methods, and a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model was adopted to reveal the driving mechanism of PLE land change in the area.
      Result  Ecological land and productive-ecological land were the main category in the study area, showing a decreasing trend. The overall change components of PLE land changed from quantity to exchange, and the change components of various categories were obviously different. The change intensities of PLE land from 1995 to 2015 were lower than those from 2015 to 2020, which showed a faster change. Productive-living land and ecological-productive land changed actively. The gain of living-productive land mainly derived from ecological land and productive-living land from 1995 to 2020. The transition intensities indicated that the stable targeting for the transition was from productive-ecological land to productive-living land, and a stable avoiding for the transition was from ecological land to productive-living land.
      Conclusion  The expansion intensity of the living-production land is continuing to rise, which mainly is driven by the construction of transport infrastructure, resulting in the encroachment of a large amount of land for production and ecological functions. In the future, the region should optimize structure of the PLE land through overall planning and policy guidance.

     

/

返回文章
返回