秸秆还田和灌溉模式对玉米物质积累转运及水氮利用效率的影响

Effects of Straw Returning to Fields and Irrigation Patterns on Maize Material Accumulation Transport and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

  • 摘要:
    目的 明确秸秆还田和浅埋滴灌条件下玉米物质积累转运以及水、氮利用效率,为玉米高产高效提供依据。
    方法 采用裂区设计,以秸秆还田方式为主处理,设秸秆二次粉碎深翻还田和秸秆离田深翻,秸秆还田处理秸秆播前用还田机进行二次粉碎至5 ~ 10 cm小段,进行深翻还田,秸秆离田处理秸秆播前打捆离田后,进行深翻作业;灌溉模式为副处理,设浅埋滴灌模式和传统畦灌模式。
    结果 玉米物质积累量、转运量和转运率,秸秆还田处理显著高于秸秆离田处理,秸秆还田条件下浅埋滴灌模式显著高于传统畦灌模式。氮素积累量,秸秆还田处理高于秸秆离田处理,秸秆还田下浅埋滴灌模式较传统畦灌模式高了3.04%,秸秆离田条件下高2.19%。氮素转运量秸秆还田条件下浅埋滴灌模式较传统畦灌模式高了6.06%,秸秆离田条件下高3.75%。籽粒灌浆速率在吐丝21 d达到最高,以秸秆还田条件下浅埋滴灌模式最高,吐丝49 d后仍然具有一定优势;灌浆活跃期强势粒在秸秆还田条件下浅埋滴灌模式较传统畦灌模式高1.06 d,秸秆离田条件下高0.66 d,弱势粒分别高0.33 d和0.37 d。0 ~ 40 cm土层土壤贮水量,收获期秸秆还田高于秸秆离田,同一还田方式下,浅埋滴灌模式高于传统畦灌模式;40 ~ 60 cm土层秸秆还田高于秸秆离田,秸秆还田下浅埋滴灌模式低于传统畦灌模式,秸秆离田下浅埋滴灌模式高于传统畦灌模式。籽粒产量和灌溉水利用效率表现为秸秆还田显著高于秸秆离田,同一还田方式下浅埋滴灌模式显著高于传统畦灌模式。水分利用效率秸秆还田高于秸秆离田,同一还田方式下浅埋滴灌模式显著高于传统畦灌模式。氮肥偏生产力在秸秆还田条件下浅埋滴灌模式较传统畦灌模式高了4.05% ~ 6.05%,在秸秆离田条件下高了5.15% ~ 7.57%,秸秆还田和灌溉模式互作对氮肥偏生产力有显著或极显著影响。
    结论 秸秆二次粉碎深翻还田浅埋滴灌技术模式,促进玉米物质积累、转运,提高籽粒灌浆速率,具有较高的籽粒产量和水、氮利用效率,是西辽河平原灌区玉米高产高效栽培适宜模式。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The aims were to investigate the effects of straw returning to the field and shallow-buried drip irrigation on maize material accumulation and transport, as well as water and nitrogen (N) use efficiency, in order to provide the basic information for increasing high-yield and high-efficiency maize production.
    Methods This study employed a split-plot design, with straw returning to the field as the primary treatment, comprising straw secondary crushing and deep ploughing to the field and deep ploughing without straw returning. For straw returning to the field, a straw incorporation machine was used to secondary-crush the straw into 5 - 10 cm lengths prior to sowing, then deep plough it into the soil. For straw non-returning to the field, baling and transporting the straw out of the field before sowing, followed by deep plowing. The irrigation patterns as secondary treatments, comprising shallow buried drip irrigation and traditional border irrigation, evaluated through two consecutive years of field positioning experiments.
    Results Results indicated that maize biomass accumulation, transport volume and transport rate were significantly higher under the treatment of straw returning to the field than that of straw non-returning conditions. Furthermore, the shallow-buried drip irrigation method was significantly higher than the traditional border irrigation method under straw returning conditions. Nitrogen accumulation was higher under straw returning than that of straw non-returning. Under straw returning conditions, N accumulation in the shallow-buried drip irrigation method was 3.04% higher than in the traditional border irrigation method, and 2.19% higher under non-returning conditions. Under conditions of straw returning to the field, the shallow-buried drip irrigation method was higher than the traditional border irrigation method by 6.06% in N transfer rates. Under conditions of straw not returning to the field, it was higher by 3.75%. Grain filling rate peaked at 21 days after silking, with the highest rate observed under the shallow-buried drip irrigation method with straw returning to the field. This advantage persisted even after 49 days after post-silking. Under straw returning conditions, the active grain filling period of strong grains was 1.06 days longer in shallow-buried drip irrigation than that in traditional border irrigation, and 0.66 days longer under straw non-returning conditions while that of weak grains was 0.33 days and 0.37 days longer. Soil water storage in the 0 - 40 cm soil layer was higher when straw was returned to the field at harvest than that removed. Under the same straw return pattern, the shallow-buried drip irrigation pattern performed better than the traditional border irrigation patten. In soil layers of 40 - 60 cm, soil water storage was higher when straw was returned to the field than straw was removed. The shallow-buried drip irrigation method with straw returned to the field performed lower than the traditional border irrigation pattern, whilst the shallow-buried drip irrigation method with straw non-returning to the field performed better than the traditional border irrigation method. Grain yield and irrigation water use efficiency were consistently higher in the straw returning treatment than in the straw non-returning treatment. Under the same straw return method, the shallow-buried drip irrigation method significantly higher than the traditional border irrigation pattern. Water use efficiency was higher in straw returning to the field than in straw non-returning. Under the same straw return method, the shallow-buried drip irrigation pattern significantly exceeded the traditional border irrigation pattern. Under straw-returning conditions, the partial factor productivity of N in the shallow-buried drip irrigation pattern was 4.05% to 6.05% higher than those in the traditional border irrigation pattern and under straw non-returning conditions (5.15% to 7.57% higher). The interaction between straw returning and irrigation patterns exerted a significant or highly significant effect on partial factor productivity of N.
    Conclusion The straw secondary crushing, deep ploughing returning to the field and shallow -buried drip irrigation pattern promotes maize material accumulation and transport, enhances grain filling rate, has higher grain yield and water and nitrogen use efficiency, which is a suitable method for high-yield and high-efficiency maize cultivation in the irrigation area of Xi Liao He plain.

     

/

返回文章
返回